The distinction that matters
Years in practice do not automatically establish experience with your particular requirements. The distinction is between general seniority and recent relevant work.
How to interpret the details
The most useful experience question names the practical issue. This might be arranging an appointment when lying face down is uncomfortable, communicating with an interpreter, or adapting the visit around a mobility device. Ask what the practitioner would need to know before confirming suitability. Avoid asking for another patient's private story as proof. A clear anonymized explanation of process can be informative without revealing anyone else's health information. If specialist coordination is needed, ask how that would be arranged before attending.
An additional consideration
Relevant experience should include recognizing when an appointment needs modification or another assessment. Confidence alone is not the useful signal. A practitioner who clearly describes limits may give you a better basis for choosing than one who claims to handle every situation.
A practical question
How often do you work with people seeking this kind of appointment, and what adaptations do you usually discuss? The limit: experience claims should not become guarantees of results.
Decision example
Hypothetical example: an experienced sports practitioner may have less experience arranging a quiet seated visit for an older adult than another provider. A useful next step is to describe your goal and access needs before selecting a provider.
Sources & further reading
Sources support the factual background. Practical planning examples are editorial guidance; they do not establish a provider’s availability.